| MASSES AND MONUMENT
– MIGRATION AND HOLLYWOOD
Film series selected by Diedrich Diederichsen (23 April –
15 May 04)
Opening lecture by Diedrich Diederichsen
Thursday, 22 April 2004, 7 pm.
In classical Hollywood cinema crowd scenes are regarded as an indication
of high production costs. At the same time, they satisfy a very
particular and specific cinematographic viewing pleasure that goes
back to the beginnings of moving pictures. For Siegfried Kracauer,
for instance, cinema was the first medium that made the new metropolitan
masses of modernism visible and also decisively contributed to both
their self-image and their self-deception: to mobilization and well
as to immobilization. In many discourses on migration it is also
the mass of migrants that accounts for their crucial and also psychologically
and propagandistically significant components. This applies particularly
to the phobic notions of invading hordes and floods that are so
central to the mobilization of xenophobia and racism. In the USA
and thus also in Hollywood cinema there are always two kinds of
crowds: these kinds of phobically perceived natural disaster-like
dehumanized floods of evil masses (Indians, aliens, Vietnamese)
and alongside and contrary to these, the positively perceived crowds
of settlers, but also of migrants, who productively contribute to
the melting pot.
Who is a good crowd and who is an evil one and how this has been
changed and fought over in the history of Hollywood is to be shown
in this series of selected examples: although certainly none of
these films are uninteresting, they are also not exemplary, and
they have not been selected for their quality, but rather because
of their symptomatic characteristics.
The earliest of the films presented here, "Intolerance"
by the film pioneer Griffith, already shows that the ambivalence
of describing masses must take the path of monumentalizing them.
At the moment where the crowds attain a face of their own beyond
the summation or intensification of the individual, they are suitable
for both dehumanization and for idealization. Griffith's film was
a kind of apology for his racist classic "Birth of a Nation",
which drastically demonized Afro-Americans. In both films, though,
one can see how fleeing or conquering, threatened or threatening
crowds can be dehumanized – and sometimes also rehumanized
- with minimal cinematographical measures. Another film in this
series was also intended as an apology: "Cheyenne Autumn"
was supposed to revise the demonization of the Native Americans
in so many Hollywood productions.
To this end it invents an image from the arsenal of the history
of European migrants that emigrated to the USA, who are usually
depicted in a positive way: the Cheyenne become the displaced, but
unlike the migrants from Europe, there is no "new homeland"
awaiting them. The pop festival monumentalization "Woodstock"
correspondingly identifies the hippie masses with a nation of displaced
persons seeking a new territory. Although differently accentuated,
"Days of Heaven", "Heavens Gate" and "Gangs
of New York" all show the situation of European migrants to
the USA in the 19th century also as a class destiny and, despite
various weaknesses, outside the realm of idealization. Migrants
in Hollywood have rarely managed to become revolutionary masses,
despite the more biblical "Spartacus", but as a sought-after
and desired special effect, especially in the first half of its
history, their image was always a lacuna open to different ideological
instrumentalizations. Standards and cliches resulted from this,
which still influence notions of crowds today, which are not represented
by a form of state or any other regulated collective identity.
Program:
|
Kino in der Brücke
Kölnischer Kunstverein
Hahnenstraße 6
D - 50667 Köln
Telefon +49 (0)221-21 70 21
Telefax +49 (0)221-21 06 51
info@koelnischerkunstverein.de
|